Te
Dominant Extroverted Thinking
Organizing by Logic and Criteria
Follow Charts, Plans, Timelines
ENTJ & ESTJ
*SNAPSHOT*
"What's wrong with this?
How can I perfect it?"
Te types love to lead, show-off, plan, and compete with self and others. They enjoy mental challenges, stating strong opinions, giving and receiving rewards based on doing and being "right." Te types strive toward perfection. They can see what is missing that should have been there. They will focus on facts, enjoy finding solutions for practical problems and critiquing ideas. Te types organize the rational external world, and suppress feelings.
|
|
Te is the shorthand for "extroverted Thinking." It is an organizing and evaluating process (JUDGING).
Extroverted Thinkers naturally see what is wrong in the world, and want to fix it. They are determined, and attempt to create order from chaos. They are natural organizers with a gift for finding and coordinating resources. They enjoy working on tangible practical projects, such as improving productivity, efficiency or profits. They organize their ideas using charts, tables, graphs, flow charts, and outlines. They are logical, and have a natural sense of order. They easily compartmentalize their lives into distinct categories.
Extroverted Thinkers love a challenge of any kind, particularly like games that have rules and stages of competency, and love to win, seeing the world has having clear winners and losers.
They are efficient and direct, good with finding the shortest distance between two points - that which is and that which "should" be. T
They are impersonal, critical, and don't mince their words, especially when voicing disappointment or displeasure, though do have a sense of fairness and justice, and a somewhat surprising sense of humor. There definition of "fair" does not include exceptions to the rule or extenuating circumstances.
They love to schedule, plan, and plan for the unplanned (contingencies). They love to apply logic to decisions and conclusions, and help others order their thinking. They are good with identifying gaps in data, and working with empirical data.
 |